Jump to content


ORB order doesn't add up!


  • You cannot reply to this topic
4 replies to this topic

#1 Eldred

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 257 posts

Posted 04 August 2003 - 05:50 AM

Just noticed (having spent a lunchtime wondering why my spreadsheet doesn't add up) that the new ORB order results (which I believe gives the total of employed and unemployed pop units at the pop group) does not appear to include pop units employed in shipyard slips. This one should be easy to fix ;)

#2 Azuth

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 224 posts
  • Interests:Conquest!

Posted 04 August 2003 - 09:51 AM

B) I knew I forgot to mention something last turn.

I did a PMAP on my homeworld and the Pop info was incorrect. I know because there's a lot of people in a Pop Group that is empty. :D

Pete, could you please check into this. I remember you mentioned the PMAP order gives you the total population (employed & unemployed) for each pop group, but it appears that its not working correctly.

Thanks

#3 Eldred

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 257 posts

Posted 07 December 2003 - 12:56 PM

<Bump>

The ORB order still fails to include population units employed in shipyard slips in the total population figure for a population group!

#4 Clan Elder 'Keen

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 356 posts

Posted 08 December 2003 - 07:20 AM

I wonder why Shipyard Slips are not treated as "normal" installations. They don't show up on your installation list, and get a special field shown on the Colony report. It strikes me as odd.

#5 RTGPete

    Keeper of the Galaxy

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 916 posts
  • Location:Denver, Colorado

Posted 09 December 2003 - 09:46 AM

Clan Elder'Keen, on Dec 8 2003, 02:20 PM, said:

I wonder why Shipyard Slips are not treated as "normal" installations. They don't show up on your installation list, and get a special field shown on the Colony report. It strikes me as odd.

Because Shipyard Slips were one of the first Installations added to the game, and ended up with their own field in the InhabitedPlanets table instead of going with the much more flexible Installations referential table...and I didn't feel like fooling with a change on it at the time :ph34r:
Pete Dorman
Rolling Thunder Games, Inc.
Pete@rollingthunder.com





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users