Jump to content


New Fleet Report Design


12 replies to this topic

#1 Lumeria

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts

Posted 20 May 2006 - 06:55 AM

YES!!!!

This has been your best formatting addition to date Pete. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

Now if only the last part of the RTD would show research progress on the tech we have some study on, like the research chart for current research...

And add the last turn's attrition to the header of the Colony report would be cool too.

#2 Hughestrog

    Old Hand

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 739 posts

Posted 22 May 2006 - 01:50 AM

Both of those could be quite useful, but the colony attrition would be better.
IGNOTUM PER IGNOTIUS

In the lab bouncing off the frontiers of Science

#3 Mechanica

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 131 posts

Posted 24 May 2006 - 04:01 AM

ali-t-akua, on May 22 2006, 09:21 AM, said:

I like the new Cargo Report format. It took a moment to get used to but I find it easier to read than the old one. One thing I would like to see added is the Special Characters that  are on assigned to that fleet (ideally in both the Fleet Report and the Cargo Report). :o

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>




Hmmm. my fleet report did show the characters I had assigned to the fleets.

#4 ali-t-akua

    Elder

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,661 posts

Posted 24 May 2006 - 06:59 AM

Mechanica, on May 24 2006, 03:01 AM, said:

ali-t-akua, on May 22 2006, 09:21 AM, said:

I like the new Cargo Report format. It took a moment to get used to but I find it easier to read than the old one. One thing I would like to see added is the Special Characters that  are on assigned to that fleet (ideally in both the Fleet Report and the Cargo Report). :cheers:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>




Hmmm. my fleet report did show the characters I had assigned to the fleets.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>




You're right so I withdraw the comment. I have gotten so used to looking at this report the old way as two reports that I did not realize that Pete had combined the two reports in one. :blink:

I think I have too many fleets. :o

I like this change even more now that I see that the two fleet reports are combined into one. :wacko:
Ali-t, the akua of
The Skyron Confederation#3857

Aloha

Currently at peace

#5 Ur Lord Tedric

    Old Hand

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 703 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 May 2006 - 02:29 AM

If we may request a tiny tweak...

If the Unemployed Pop and the Owning Empire columns could be swapped from the Installations Report to and from the Stockpiles report, that would be great.

It's the Stockpiles we need every turn - and that's where we need the Pop that can be used.

Indeed the establishing empire is a little confusing, but overall it's a great change - especially the Fleet reports :o

Many thanks

Chief Planner to Ur-Lord Tedric

#6 ali-t-akua

    Elder

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,661 posts

Posted 25 May 2006 - 07:47 AM

Ur Lord Tedric, on May 25 2006, 01:29 AM, said:

If we may request a tiny tweak...

If the Unemployed Pop and the Owning Empire columns could be swapped from the Installations Report to and from the Stockpiles report, that would be great.

It's the Stockpiles we need every turn - and that's where we need the Pop that can be used.

Indeed the establishing empire is a little confusing, but overall it's a great change - especially the Fleet reports :o

Many thanks

Chief Planner to Ur-Lord Tedric

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I would like to see Unemployed Pop in both places. It helps in the Installation section if you are trying to figure out how many total pop you have in a particular group but it is useful in the Stockpile section as well.
Ali-t, the akua of
The Skyron Confederation#3857

Aloha

Currently at peace

#7 Clan Elder 'Keen

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 356 posts

Posted 25 May 2006 - 05:02 PM

Ur Lord Tedric, on May 25 2006, 05:29 AM, said:

If we may request a tiny tweak...

If the Unemployed Pop and the Owning Empire columns could be swapped from the Installations Report to and from the Stockpiles report, that would be great.

It's the Stockpiles we need every turn - and that's where we need the Pop that can be used.

Indeed the establishing empire is a little confusing, but overall it's a great change - especially the Fleet reports :o

Many thanks

Chief Planner to Ur-Lord Tedric

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



Excellent point. I would like to see it in the order of production lists, stockpiles, then installations.

#8 Locklyn

    Elder

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,077 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sweden, Umeå
  • Interests:Gaming Duh! :) Women (make that Woman now a days) Eating well and drinking better. Enjoying life enough to forget what I do for a living (ER Nurse)

Posted 25 May 2006 - 09:29 PM

I noticed a small BUG in the installations section, if you have several pop groups on the same world it seems the only shipyard slips shown are that of the first one, which can make it very confusing for the shipyard engineers :o

Kudos for all the interesting changes

:cheers:

/Locklyn
Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici
Emperor of the Genesian Gremloid Technocracy
Currently At War With:

The Hellenic League (Defeated)
The Sholfaran Confederacy (Defeated)
The Neeve Dynasty (Defeated)
The SFI (Defeated)
The Symbiots (Defeated)
The Rekalia Domain (Defeated)
The Republic of Jemp (Defeated)
The House Atreides (Defeated)
The Underdeep (WAR!)
All Phoenix Arisen Empires (WAR!)
The Raven Empire (Defeated)
All incarnations of MMB (Spawns By The Minute)

#9 RTGPete

    Keeper of the Galaxy

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 905 posts
  • Location:Denver, Colorado

Posted 25 May 2006 - 10:17 PM

Locklyn, on May 25 2006, 09:29 PM, said:

I noticed a small BUG in the installations section, if you have several pop groups on the same world it seems the only shipyard slips shown are that of the first one, which can make it very confusing for the shipyard engineers :o

Kudos for all the interesting changes

:cheers:

/Locklyn

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Yes, that and some other issues are known - working on some changes for the next cycle.
Pete Dorman
Rolling Thunder Games, Inc.
Pete@rollingthunder.com

#10 Lumeria

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts

Posted 27 May 2006 - 08:51 AM

RTGPete, on May 26 2006, 01:17 AM, said:

Locklyn, on May 25 2006, 09:29 PM, said:

I noticed a small BUG in the installations section, if you have several pop groups on the same world it seems the only shipyard slips shown are that of the first one, which can make it very confusing for the shipyard engineers :thumbsup:

Kudos for all the interesting changes

:drunk:

/Locklyn

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Yes, that and some other issues are known - working on some changes for the next cycle.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>




If a fleet has fuel tanks and cargo bays but they are empty, could the fleet report still show up and list 0 of 1,000,000 rather than being blank?

#11 Clan Elder 'Keen

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 356 posts

Posted 05 June 2006 - 04:16 PM

Please go back to sorting the Ship Design Report by ship name, rather than the current ship class.

#12 Paradigm

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 300 posts
  • Interests:Sleeping, drinking beer, COBOL programming.

Posted 06 June 2006 - 06:53 AM

Clan Elder'Keen, on Jun 6 2006, 12:16 AM, said:

Please go back to sorting the Ship Design Report by ship name, rather than the current ship class.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



Yes. I second that. When I look at that report I'm looking for a particular ship by class name.
NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSIT

#13 RTGPete

    Keeper of the Galaxy

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 905 posts
  • Location:Denver, Colorado

Posted 06 June 2006 - 11:02 AM

Paradigm, on Jun 6 2006, 06:53 AM, said:

Clan Elder'Keen, on Jun 6 2006, 12:16 AM, said:

Please go back to sorting the Ship Design Report by ship name, rather than the current ship class.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



Yes. I second that. When I look at that report I'm looking for a particular ship by class name.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>



Done.
Pete Dorman
Rolling Thunder Games, Inc.
Pete@rollingthunder.com





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users