Hi
Just wondering on 2 things.
What is use of the TPL security army.
Why should I use this? To what security rating is this added?
Second question
Will a land front fortification remain in place when the enemy conquers the province?
Marc
Two questions
Started by Horus, Feb 26 2004 12:41 AM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 26 February 2004 - 12:41 AM
#2
Posted 26 February 2004 - 01:17 AM
Horus,
The TPL SEC gives you a bonus on all security operations; All chances to stop rangers get a bonus. Also chances to stop covert funding are increased.
Land fortifications wiil remain in the game, until scrapped by the owner of the province. This is also the same for city fortifications.
I hope this is enough answer to your questions.
Norbert
The TPL SEC gives you a bonus on all security operations; All chances to stop rangers get a bonus. Also chances to stop covert funding are increased.
Land fortifications wiil remain in the game, until scrapped by the owner of the province. This is also the same for city fortifications.
I hope this is enough answer to your questions.
Norbert
What is the meaning of life?
QUOTE
Life is that unfortunate time between wargames...(Larry Leadhead)
#3
Posted 26 February 2004 - 04:16 PM
Quote
Second question
Will a land front fortification remain in place when the enemy conquers the province?
Will a land front fortification remain in place when the enemy conquers the province?
Any and all fixed defenses are eliminated when an enemy conquers said province/city. Fortifications are fixed defenses.
I should know, I've lost quite a few of them.
#4
Posted 26 February 2004 - 11:04 PM
Commander Azuth,
Fortifications are special defences, which remain in place after the province or city is conquered. Of cource, with the change of owner of the city or province, the owner of the fortification also changes.
These are too large structures to destroy overnight, let alone just before a conquest.
You are right about all other fixed defences like LAA, HAA, CLAB and CHAB. Of cource LDBs are destroyed in the attack. In case of an amphibious landing, the CLAB and CHAB are also destroyed in the attack.
Norbert
Fortifications are special defences, which remain in place after the province or city is conquered. Of cource, with the change of owner of the city or province, the owner of the fortification also changes.
These are too large structures to destroy overnight, let alone just before a conquest.
You are right about all other fixed defences like LAA, HAA, CLAB and CHAB. Of cource LDBs are destroyed in the attack. In case of an amphibious landing, the CLAB and CHAB are also destroyed in the attack.
Norbert
What is the meaning of life?
QUOTE
Life is that unfortunate time between wargames...(Larry Leadhead)
#5
Posted 27 February 2004 - 02:58 AM
*nods*
Fortifications are -not- destroyed when conquered. (I mean the bunkers of the atlantic wall are still there even after nearly 60 years)
ofcourse in case of landfront fortifications they are often facing the wrong direction for a conquering enemy to be useful.
Fortifications are -not- destroyed when conquered. (I mean the bunkers of the atlantic wall are still there even after nearly 60 years)
ofcourse in case of landfront fortifications they are often facing the wrong direction for a conquering enemy to be useful.
#6
Posted 27 February 2004 - 07:27 AM
I should probably read the rules, but it is my understanding that fortifications are reduced by one level when conquered.
#7
Posted 27 February 2004 - 07:45 AM
it's not in the rules I think but I experienced the same thing.
Fortifications loose when level after being transferred from owner
Fortifications loose when level after being transferred from owner
"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic"
Joseph Stalin
Joseph Stalin
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












