I do have an opinion, and i don't care too much about the often somewhat childish tone of the discussion. After all, Noone is required to participate and we are all free to ignore everyone else.
But there is a certain lack of serious discussion, true.
Lets start discussing one of the following:
1- Ten ways to improve Victory without major changes to the system.
2- Ten reasons unlikely countries like Syria and Baltic states have a x3 survival rate compared to France.
3- Is it possible to make a fifth tech using French units, being strong at first but weakening further on. (something like a reverse American tech). If so, what about the Normandie AP, Somua Armored div and ATA of the Dewoitine fighters? Anyone interested in designing a Japanese Tech? Italian? Swedish?
4- What would a game be like were every player would play a set of 2 countries which are TA'ed with intel sharing on, and no other TA's are possible so no-one has an intel or permanent diplomatic advantage? If so, which paires of countries would be advisable?
5- Anyone interested in playing a game with the historical dimplomatic setup of September 1939?
Axis: Spain, Germany, Austria, Chechoslovakia, Rumania, Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, Italia, Libya,
Allied: Great Brittain, USA, Canada, France, Marocco, Transjordan, Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria.
Soviet: Central, souther and Northern Russia, Baltic states.
Un-played Neutrals: the rest!
6- Post the "world events" from each game in a posting on each specific game-related topic. Players that are not part of that game can keep up with those world events. It makes reading the forum far more interesting.
I could go on-and on.