gecko Posted November 30, 2020 Report Share Posted November 30, 2020 I think the biggest issue with the CL in this case is the size of the TA group in question. One declares against the principles of the TA group, and then there is another member who is part of a 2nd group, then a 3rd group. If we trace the line of TAs, it encompasses 16 nations. It could be more, as some of those nations have not filled out their TA limits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fremen Posted December 1, 2020 Report Share Posted December 1, 2020 That is indeed the issue. If there was a group that did set that up for whatever reason it would require multiple DW’s on many different nations per the SOP of DW on all the TA’s of your enemies. in other news The 🐑 molesters look to have turned tail and ran. Not without causing some damage in some lost economic output though. This will be quickly corrected baaaaaaahahhaha 😁. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dageraad Posted December 1, 2020 Report Share Posted December 1, 2020 Ah, I see the spirit of the sheep has returned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predator Posted December 2, 2020 Report Share Posted December 2, 2020 On 11/30/2020 at 5:41 PM, gecko said: I think the biggest issue with the CL in this case is the size of the TA group in question. One declares against the principles of the TA group, and then there is another member who is part of a 2nd group, then a 3rd group. If we trace the line of TAs, it encompasses 16 nations. It could be more, as some of those nations have not filled out their TA limits. And yet it was only ceded to one country and stopped there to stop an army moving one turn. It was ceded around and therefore not “abused” and not by algeria though I stand accused of abuse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gecko Posted December 2, 2020 Report Share Posted December 2, 2020 Yes Predator, you are correct. Had that one nation not been a member of a third alliance group, this conversation would probably have never happened. Assumed guilty by association. Many of the other players found their nations on the list for the same reason. I have no reason to question your ethics or game play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dageraad Posted December 16, 2020 Report Share Posted December 16, 2020 The map halfway through turn 8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marklen X Posted December 19, 2020 Report Share Posted December 19, 2020 I think this might be the greatest intermixing of wars I can remember. Other then the western nations, virtually everybody has chosen a side in the European war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predator Posted December 19, 2020 Report Share Posted December 19, 2020 1 hour ago, Marklen X said: I think this might be the greatest intermixing of wars I can remember. Other then the western nations, virtually everybody has chosen a side in the European war. We haven’t Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marklen X Posted December 19, 2020 Report Share Posted December 19, 2020 Well, you seem to be at war with the Arab group, if I read the map correct, they're at war with the Balkan Group and the ME group, who are at war with our group and the Central European group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dageraad Posted December 20, 2020 Report Share Posted December 20, 2020 Yes, well, there are limits to the things cartography can display. Like: - Which war is "hot" and which one is just for preventing CL issues. A lot of the DW are "preventive" - Which war is a real conflict and which one is to better make war against a third party. Like in #104. - There is a difference between being at war against him and waging war. Time will sort out these things. Follow this space. But for this moment, Algeria and Tunisia are waging war against Morocco and only Morocco. There has been an unfortunate incident concerning some border signs and a misunderstanding with our sheep-loving cousins, but no blood has been spilled. Yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rednas Posted December 23, 2020 Report Share Posted December 23, 2020 Wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, stay safe. Greetings Rednas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Michael Posted December 24, 2020 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2020 I wish you all a Very Merry Christmas,be safe, be happy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dageraad Posted December 31, 2020 Report Share Posted December 31, 2020 Halfway through turn 9. May all your explosions and fireworks be to your amusement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marklen X Posted January 1, 2021 Report Share Posted January 1, 2021 A bit of green creep north. Odd to see that yellow speck surrounded by blue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dageraad Posted January 1, 2021 Report Share Posted January 1, 2021 Well, yes, on the detailed map it makes sense, As xDamascus is only 2 SMR from the Transjordan/Egyptian border, some of the provinces in between were taken by Egypt and Libya but none of the cities. And the map is based on RWE, so conquered provinces don't show up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.