Jump to content
Rolling Thunder Forums

Recommended Posts

I think the biggest issue with the CL in this case is the size of the TA group in question.  One declares against the principles of the TA group, and then there is another member who is part of a 2nd group, then a 3rd group. If we trace the line of TAs, it encompasses 16 nations. It could be more, as some of those nations have not filled out their TA limits.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That is indeed the issue. If there was a group that did set that up for whatever reason it would require multiple DW’s on many different nations per the SOP of DW on all the TA’s of your enemies. 
 

in other news

The 🐑 molesters look to have turned tail and ran. Not without causing some damage in some lost economic output though. This will be quickly corrected baaaaaaahahhaha 😁

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/30/2020 at 5:41 PM, gecko said:

I think the biggest issue with the CL in this case is the size of the TA group in question.  One declares against the principles of the TA group, and then there is another member who is part of a 2nd group, then a 3rd group. If we trace the line of TAs, it encompasses 16 nations. It could be more, as some of those nations have not filled out their TA limits.

And yet it was only ceded to one country and stopped there to stop an army moving one turn. It was ceded around and therefore not “abused”

and not by algeria though I stand accused of abuse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Predator, you are correct. Had that one nation not been a member of a third alliance group, this conversation would probably have never happened.

Assumed guilty by association. Many of the other players found their nations on the list for the same reason.

I have no reason to question your ethics or game play.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Yes, well, there are limits to the things cartography can display. Like:
- Which war is "hot" and which one is just for preventing CL issues. A lot of the DW are "preventive"
- Which war is a real conflict and which one is to better make war against a third party. Like in #104. 
- There is a difference between being at war against him and waging war. 

Time will sort out these things. Follow this space. But for this moment, Algeria and Tunisia are waging war against Morocco and only Morocco. There has been an unfortunate incident concerning some border signs and a misunderstanding with our sheep-loving cousins, but no blood has been spilled. 

Yet. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, stay safe. 

Greetings Rednas 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, yes, on the detailed map it makes sense, As

xDamascus is only 2 SMR from the Transjordan/Egyptian border,
some of the provinces  in between were taken by Egypt and Libya 
but none of the cities. And the map is based on RWE, 
so conquered provinces don't show up.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...