Jump to content
Rolling Thunder Forums

open ended game


Marklen X

Recommended Posts

The last time I played an accelerated game, we played an open ended game, meaning it did not have an arbitrary end turn, and we played it to a finish. In order to do that, it requires a unanamous vote of all players. It can be real frustrating to be in the middle of a huge fight and suddenly the game just stops. What say all of you gung ho boys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for it, but.... :ph34r:

 

 

Wouldn't Russ and company have to say we could...... :unsure:

Please :thumbsup:

 

 

If they need a vote okay by me, the more death and destruction.... :blink:

 

I mean reconstruction and violence relief,

the aid to end countless suffering.. for :cheers:

 

At least those on my side..... :ranting:

 

 

DezertCamel :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russ has no problem with it, it is up to the players.

Correct - no problem on my end but considering that it was not announced as an open-ended game before startup, it would require a unanimous vote by all the nations of Game 71 to convert it to an open-ended game.

 

Russ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did someone mention extended bloodshed....I mean Doctor Training?? :lol:

 

Count me in!! :blink:

 

We could do like some other PBM's I've been in and have a specific agenda for Victory. Such as a single player or alliance reaching 1,000,000 Arm/Air/Naval points destroyed.

 

I'm sure we could all come to some sort of agreement and play on from there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shouldn't that be the first country controlling all capitals?

 

I like the idea.

 

But, should America and Canada count...

 

I mean, its like after I take all of Europe, THEN I have to mount this huge long protracted sea assualt on America and Canada... :robot:

 

Also, with this, do the number of orders keep going up after every 25 turns(beyond turn 76)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After giving this some thought...I think the controlling all capitals idea has an issue with it, in that it turns the game into just going after capitals.

 

So, I am thinking more than just the capitals to win.

 

We could make it really hard, have to control every province and city of 30 countries(or more) to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you have played RISK too much...... :rolleyes:

 

I guess that means north america and the Russia's get bouns points since they are impossible to defend... :(

 

It does not matter what the goal is, as long as you control it all..... :taz:

 

Capitals, cities, provinces.... :blink:

 

Now to quote a old but good movie,

 

"There can only be one" :thumbsup:

 

Open -ended means till everybody loses but one group or one player....

 

I mean if we wanted to play a group game we could have started one, like somebody tried a few years back...

 

Or even more fun, everybody gets the same tech.....British.... this way everybody would fight on an even plain.... :ranting:

 

But that is a future to be determined at a different time..... :drunk:

 

And May IRELAND be the ONE..... :robot:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...