athonian Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locklyn Posted April 26, 2005 Report Share Posted April 26, 2005 RTGPete Jan 13 2005, 10:59 PM Post #13 Keeper of the Galaxy Group: Admin Posts: 523 Joined: 29-June 03 From: Denver, Colorado Member No.: 3 I'm going out of town this weekend (after I get this turn out, of course!) but will be updating the Space Combat document when I get back. Expect considerable detail concerning fighters, drones, point defenses and general defensive systems" I'm going out on an extended tentacle here and ask what the ETA for this document is especially in view of the ANZ now accurstely reporting figures some new questions has been raised and older ones still have not been answered? Cheers /Locklyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Miles Avatar Posted May 1, 2005 Report Share Posted May 1, 2005 Hmmmm. a little over 3 months since this update to the Naval Combat Document... I suspect the delay might have something to do with the fighters/drones and a few other things not being quite right. Heck I have the patience of a saint but I would like at least some kind of update as Im sure most other players would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sakarissa Posted May 1, 2005 Report Share Posted May 1, 2005 We've already had the update. What do you think prompted the Mk II ANZ? I believe they were created to help make the Naval Combat Doctrine easier to understand. They are working on it. Progress is being made. Be patient young padawans. Sakarissa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowKitsune Posted May 1, 2005 Report Share Posted May 1, 2005 We've already had the update. What do you think prompted the Mk II ANZ? I believe they were created to help make the Naval Combat Doctrine easier to understand. They are working on it. Progress is being made. Be patient young padawans. Sakarissa <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Going over to the Dark Side ... it comes with instant gratification. -SK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
octagon999 Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 You are wise, but you are not yet a Jedi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locklyn Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 We've already had the update. What do you think prompted the Mk II ANZ? Actually no update has been made to the naval combat primer draft since it was released in September 2003. In April 2004 Pete said he was doing a complete write and asked what people wanted in it and since then it's pretty quiet about it. The ANZ update was great in getting solid numbers but it also raised a lot of questions which could have been answered by the naval combat primer. /Locklyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krelnett_of_Kraan Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Unfortunately there are still no solid numbers on defensive items. It's nice knowing the integrity ratio of armor, but force shields and screens are still a complete mystery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locklyn Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Yes and this has been brought to Petes attention and I hope he will have fixed it for this turns ANZ rounds. /Locklyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krelnett_of_Kraan Posted May 6, 2005 Report Share Posted May 6, 2005 Yes and this has been brought to Petes attention and I hope he will have fixed it for this turns ANZ rounds. /Locklyn <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Doesn't help those of use who wasted 3-5 orders on them last turn, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locklyn Posted May 6, 2005 Report Share Posted May 6, 2005 I wasted those same orders too so I hear your pain! Hopefully it'all be sorted out for this turn but Pete has not commented much on the boards. /Locklyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Miles Avatar Posted May 7, 2005 Report Share Posted May 7, 2005 didnt happen this turn. Both ANZ's on my very best Force shield techs just gave a description no defense rating unlike all the weapon and fighter techs I ANZ's this turn. perhaps next turn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Xaar Posted May 7, 2005 Report Share Posted May 7, 2005 Force shield ratings are pretty easy to figure out. As were the Armor ratings... The new ANZ's are a good start - I'm sure we'll be seeing more improvements in the near future. -LX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ur Lord Tedric Posted May 8, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Force shield ratings are pretty easy to figure out. As were the Armor ratings... The new ANZ's are a good start - I'm sure we'll be seeing more improvements in the near future. -LX <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The ANZ results, however, are showing up a number of anomalies that we need resolved. Firstly the Standard & Point Blank weapon strength figures are not the same as the ones we have seen in the Battle Reports. We suspect that this is due to the fact that we see the figure that applies in DepLoc 2, but we would like this confirmed in a general GM message on turns. Secondly, there are some obvious errors occurring in a few of the strengths seen. Please would everyone pass these on to the Oracle so that they can be amended asap.... Chief Warmaster to Ur-Lord Tedric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locklyn Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Ur-Lord; Have you gotten anymore on the fighter queries? /Locklyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.